I today received a 2 year court order warning me that I could be jailed if I do not remove my entire website. As you can see, the website is still here – my reasonable excuse being that I have been bullied off of social media, this is the only place I can continue to advertise my work, and (as police are aware) I am being bullied by an extremely pretentious paedophile ring. This court ruling was based on a Judge’s negligent and lazy decision, itself based on the PERJURY WITH INTENT TO PERVERT THE COURSE OF JUSTICE committed by someone identified to us and to police as having been in Colin Batley’s paedophile ring. As per this ruling I have temporarily complied by removing all posts naming this individual, as well as a large number that did not – the Judge not having spent the time to fully consider and comprehend all the evidence presented to them, nor the magnitude of the situation and the danger his decision would bring to myself. Hidden on this list of individual posts created by the perjurer was the address of the website itself, and I do not believe the Judge was aware of this. At no point did the Judge specifically tell me to take down the entire website, and I had agreed to temporarily remove posts naming them. There is to be a second hearing in OCTOBER and the case is not yet concluded.
This same perjurer spreads lies about me on the internet intended not just to cover up their own crimes, and to damage my credibility, but which have already resulted in physical violence against me as well as death threats. The risk of removing all posts defending myself against their defamation, slander, and libel are thus extremely high. I am in no way in contempt of the court when I say the Judge was not aware of the full situation, which is nothing like anything he will have had to deal with before. This post is damage limitation, practically and legally, which I cannot do without at least alluding to the source of the defamation.
Their lies included a long list of the usual false accusations against myself for which there is no evidence whatsoever; including but not limited to accusations of harassment and threats. The person making these accusations is themselves guilty of harassment and threats against myself, as well as spreading defamation that has severely damaged my reputation and life. Their defamation has been shared on Reddit lists with thousands of people. There are also posts like this from Twitter troll James Hind aka ‘Satanic Views’, who feigns incapability of critical functioning and / or is knowingly and deliberately defending these same extremely sadistic paedophiles (thankfully there are new laws coming that should help shut down anonymous / fake accounts that spread such defamation). Their following at the time of publication is 619, with all posts visible to the public, even those without social media accounts of any kind.
‘James Hind’ has no rational reason to claim I am dishonest or that those I have exposed are ‘innocent victims’. I have already been cleared of such dishonesty in a court.
I shall also EASILY have the decision overturned at the proper hearing, after a fact finding – wait and see. Hind knows (s)he is a liar and loves to think their abusive posts ‘trigger’ me. I do not know who they are but I do know they are directly linked with the paedophile ring. I am patient and know this short sighted psychopath will one day be exposed and take a terrible fall. It is posts like theirs which will aid in having the case overturned, as it shows I am indeed the victim of harassment and not the perpetrator. It also shows they are directly linked to the ring – and encouraged to make such posts by the very person who has accused me of the crimes Hind is guilty of (cyberstalking, harassment, defamation, bullying) – since this information is not what I had at the time of their post made public.
New laws will hopefully soon be in place to prevent the use of anonyomous accounts to cyber-bully and spread defamation. Accounts like Hind’s will be closed down – and although there will be little to stop them making more fake accounts they will at least have been exposed for the fraud they are. Fingers crossed they might even go to jail.. although I suspect a going to jail for cyber-harassment is the least of their Satanic paedophile worries.
Why no mention of the coming hearing and the fact finding, Hind? The case is yet to be concluded. Perhaps this information is not included because it does not support your paedophile protecting lies. The reality is that the guilty are screwed big time by their own actions. It just takes a little patience. It just so happens I have beaten this same shit in court before, despite their initial lies having an effect they were exposed and their previous victory overturned. Just as one day Hind will be exposed. No ruling has been made that my allegations are false or malicious and the court order is temporary. I’ll bet Hind won’t ‘report’ on that when I beat the lies.
No that is not what will happen. We will go back to court, yes, and once there I shall offer evidence that the person who brought the spurious complaint has been trolling me with a sockpuppet / encouraging others to publish defamation. This will prove they are at best a hypocrite and an unreliable witness.
Whoever this ‘Hind’ moron is they have been posting persistent defamation of my name for a loooong time. The only reaon legal action has not been taken against them is that we cannot prove who they really are.
Most of those that join with Hind’s defamation and abuse are also sockpuppets. It is likely they are controlled by the same psycho, or were also in Batley’s ring. No sensible, rational, and critical thinking individual can fail to see there is substance to my allegations – nobody without investment in covering up for Batley’s cult ever have difficulty understanding this. Even Jasmine’s boss knows about our problems.
James Hind also a blog with so many posts about me they have their own tagline: https://satanicviews.wordpress.com/tag/nathaniel-harris/
And WTF is this ‘Satan Hunter’ bullshit? I am not a Christian conspiracy theorist. I still publish occult books. Even Angela Power-Disney understands this, even if she thinks I still practice Chaos Magic (have I not made enough posts and statements otherwise? WTF is wrong with these people?) You’re not ‘adding up’ at all Hind.. and how did you find out about the court results the same day as they were delivered to myself and the ‘complainant’? Literally within an hour or two? Are you just perhaps the same person? James Hind is a fake account taking its name from a highwayman of Oxford folklore.. are they perhaps Mogg Morgan, also identified as having been in Batley’s cult? You do realise this order only defends TWO of those identified, right? And even then only because of a highly questionable legal loophole. I can also still tell you it was the entire current leadership of the Illuminates of Thanateros, that my parents Ann & Adrian Brynn-Evans were involved, along with their friend and Jasmine’s ex-partner Peter Pracownick.
The Hind account is not the only account that has been trolling, threatening, harassing and defaming me. They are all anonymous accounts, putting me at a disadvantage since everything I post is in my own name.
The court hearing itself was by telephone due to Covid. Despite the government website stating quite clearly that there would be the opportunity to present document electronically, and that details of where to send such documents would be given on the day, the Judge denied me the right to present my evidence. Additionally, despite the paper against me being a 100 page diatribe of lies, which he had clearly not read properly since they simply do not ‘add up’, I was restricted to a mere 10 page reply with 10 pages of evidence. Thankfully this has prove enough to present the evidence required to prove the case bringer a liar – neglecting to mention they are a leading figure in a black magic cult clearly implicated in a very real paedophile ring, members of which are already in jail – all of which there is significant evidence for, even with unfair the limitation placed upon me.
I am in the process of appealing the Court’s decision, which acts to place myself in further danger and protects the paedophiles from exposure. I am a professional author and artist who has already had their career damaged by the bullying and harassment of the very person who applied for the ruling – this person being guilty of criminal conspiracy and extreme child abuse. While I have removed any articles naming this person I will not concede to a ruling that is not only a miscarriage of justice but which could also severely damage my income as well as leave me undefended against a barrage of online defamation largely originating with the liar that brought the court case in the first place.
I have also registered a complaint against the Judge for proceeding along a false premise he should, if he had been as careful as the responsibility he is given requires, have been able to see through. Since the proceeding was recorded this should be cut and dry.
It is bad enough having to deal with all the defamation and bullying I have suffered on and offline from these people, all of which will be presented as evidence in my appeal. There will also be a drawn out case in which the liar should – when evidence is presented – be exposed to the court as an unreliable witness who has committed perjury in an attempt to pervert the course of justice. This in itself could prove invaluable when seeing the guilty’s eventual prosecution.
In 2013 it was found in court that I am not the source of the disclosures on which the allegations are made, and nor are these disclosures the only evidence. The Judge said we had been failed by the system. It became clear that we were innocent, and that those that had been brought in as witnesses were all unreliable. No gagging order was placed on me with regards to speaking or writing about the case. I will not accept a gagging order based on an ill informed decision made by a Judge who does not know all the facts. However costly it becomes I will fight such decisions all the way.
If and when Hind’s true identity is revealed we shall of course be taking legal action against them.. and more besides.
I have said all I need to and the ruling will make no real difference. The only reason my blog ever goes on about these Id-IOTs is in response to them having a pop at me. Without it I would just be getting along with writing I can earn money from. If they had never abused anyone I would have remained as a clown (Circus and nightclubs.. I was never a children’s entertainer) and would never have written another occult book. I would literally have wandered off and left them with ‘the field’. I am quite inclined to do this anyway since the kids they abused are now adults – they no longer need my protection and must now stand up for themselves rather than keeping schtum and making me look bad for trying to help in the first place.
All I want is for this to be over so I can get on with my life. I am 51 this year and time just seems to go by faster.
Updated 23.20 – Hind doesn’t know when he’s been beaten and is still spreading defamation.
- Hind’s tweets are illegal defamation intended to confound serious disclosures of a very real proven to exist paedophile ring. 2. He most certainly DOES have connection with the ring, as has been proven by his own blog posts, many of which repeat the same defamation as they do, and some of which even names them as his source, as well as interacting with them online. If there is no connecetion then HOW DID HE KNOW ABOUT THE COURT RULING??? Did SATAN tell him? What a dumbass liar. Again, it is clear ‘they’ (it is not at all implausible the account is controlled by more than one person) have a vested interest because nobody is that obtuse by accident 3. His blog posts just seriously undermined the very court case this moron is ‘celebrating’ as a ‘success’. What a moron.
I think most people reading this will see I am being rational and not having some kind of ‘melt down’. What hubris to think I am posting this for any other reason than it proves I am the target of defamation and a hate campaign linking directly back to the paedo ring. Hind has NO PROOF AT ALL to justify their stance, whereas the links between those already jailed and those we identified are easily shown, along with a growing amount of other evidence, of which the James Hind account’s defamation plays a small part. It is so stupid it is almost funny.. even while the situation remains so grave. Hind takes SADISTIC delight in imagining they can ‘push my buttons’.. just like the person they are defending. Hmmmmmmmm…..
As for Ann Drogyne – she must surely be intelligent enough to know I don’t go off at ‘randoms’, and it is suspect she should support this idea since it originates with the paedophile ring. This is the same person who made a video about me calling me ugly and misquoting me as claiming I had slept with hundreds of women (I said I had a lot of lovers when I was still young and pretty, but never said what genders they were.. they have included the entire spectrum including TWO born intersex lovers. I love people for being people and don’t really care what genders they are.. and I’m not sorry if that offends any mad Xtian anti-LGBTV bigots). She also made false claims that I trolled her accounts and had to be blocked over YouTube. Sorry Ann, I have never had any interest in you apart from that you are consorting with cyber-bullies while claiming to be a campaigner against the very same behaviour. And this was in response to my video with Attwood (thankfully now removed since association with him causes more harm than good) where I had been candid about our case and was clearly suffering just having to talk about it. “If you’re going to put yourself out there you have to be prepared to take it” she said – as if I was ‘putting myself out there’ for any reason other than to expose the criminals that put guns to people’s heads and force them to rape children on camera.
She is well aware that cyber-bullying can drive people to suicide and sides with the worst cyber-bullies imaginable – extremely pretentious paedophiles and their ‘defenders’. Thank Gods she is no longer a police officer. I am certainly not upset that she doesn’t find me attractive and have no idea what she would find fascinating about me under any circumstances. I do however know her narcissistic arrogance will be her own downfall and I am glad not to be her. The comments under the video on YouTube say it all..
UPDATE 16/07/2021 – Further misinformation that needs addressing, should any of Hind’s black sheep care to bleat and different bleat..
The complaint was logged yesterday (Thursday). It should take around 20 days to be processed. Is Hind claiming now to be able to divine the future? Because I don’t think much of their talent! ROFLMPO (rolling on the floor laughing my paradigm off).